"ST. PAUL, Minn. - In an effort to help Sen. Larry Craig, the American Civil Liberties Union is arguing that people who have sex in public bathrooms have an expectation of privacy.I think I have to disagree with the ACLU on this one. If I were the judge writing on this I would note the probable intrusion of noise of a generally identifiable type, the intrusion of asking for sex underneath the stall door, in certain places the vandalism of stalls for the purposes of bathroom sex (although I guess that’s covered under vandalism, which you could still be prosecuted for), the spreading of yet more substances you wouldn’t want on yourself in the bathroom (lube, worse), and related to that last point, people who didn’t wash their hands moving those substances all over the bathroom and onto places I have to touch.Craig, of Idaho, is asking the Minnesota Court of Appeals to let him withdraw his guilty plea to disorderly conduct stemming from a bathroom sex sting at the Minneapolis airport.
The ACLU filed a brief Tuesday supporting Craig. It cited a Minnesota Supreme Court ruling 38 years ago that found that people who have sex in closed stalls in public restrooms "have a reasonable expectation of privacy." (AP via Yahoo)
If you can expect privacy for doing the deed in a public bathroom, can’t you begin to argue the point that if you do it in a sleeping bag with the top pulled over your heads, you have an expectation of privacy in the middle of a public park? (I use that particular example because I was subjected to it back in high school during a training ride for a bike trip to Duluth).
Mean Mr. Mustard….you’re the lawyer…what’s your take? Do I have to start worrying more about which local restrooms I frequent? This absolutely won't apply to corporate bathrooms...right?