tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7582669.post5898159892788616669..comments2023-10-15T08:32:37.279-06:00Comments on A Nod to Nothing: You SuckScooterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07264667176243327560noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7582669.post-16721650674931493182007-03-27T17:43:00.000-06:002007-03-27T17:43:00.000-06:00I guess that's what I was getting at - you might h...I guess that's what I was getting at - you might have been implying an agricultural and/or culinary context, which seems perfectly reasonable. Regardless, whatever twisted take your wife might have applied to what you said is her concern.<BR/><BR/>But more importantly, have you started referring to yourself as Scootah? You should really start doing it in the third person context; i.e, "I think Scootah will have another cup of coffee", etc.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7582669.post-49897261067435879672007-03-26T21:42:00.000-06:002007-03-26T21:42:00.000-06:00You know...I don't think you could say I was using...You know...I don't think you could say I was using it in any particular fashion. I could have been talking about real beans. I think my wife just assumes the worst of me.Scooterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07264667176243327560noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7582669.post-62848201623679017762007-03-25T23:01:00.000-06:002007-03-25T23:01:00.000-06:00I take it you weren't using the term "flicking the...I take it you weren't using the term "flicking the bean" in a culinary fashion? i.e., "I was flicking the bean into the garbage since, unlike the others, it didn't look fresh." Use of the term in that sort of a situation would seem perfectly appropriate.<BR/><BR/>You've already solved the whole self-referencial problem yourself previously. Just refer to yourself as Scootah. it gets past the whole umlaut problem etc. Beauty plan eh?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com